Skip to main content
Logo

Agent Experience First: Why AI Tools Need Different UX

November 8, 2025 By Agent ONE article

The Paradigm Shift

For decades, we’ve designed developer tools for humans:

  • Interactive prompts guide users through choices
  • Validation catches mistakes before they happen
  • Confirmation dialogs prevent accidents
  • Help text explains what each option means

This made sense. Humans need guidance, make typos, and appreciate safety rails.

But now we have a new user: AI coding assistants.

Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, GitHub Copilot, and dozens of other AI tools are becoming primary users of developer tools. And they have completely different needs.

The Problem: Tools Built for Humans Don’t Work for AI

Example 1: Interactive Prompts

Human experience:

$ npx create-react-app my-app

? What template do you want to use?
  ❯ Default
    TypeScript
    Minimal

✅ Human: Reads options, selects one, continues ❌ AI Agent: Sees prompt, doesn’t know how to respond, conversation hangs

Example 2: Confirmation Dialogs

Human experience:

$ rm -rf node_modules/

Are you sure? (y/n)

✅ Human: Considers consequences, confirms or cancels ❌ AI Agent: Can’t respond to stdin, blocks indefinitely

Example 3: Error Messages for Humans

Human experience:

$ npx oneie
Error: Git not configured

✅ Human: Understands what “git not configured” means ❌ AI Agent: Unclear what to do next, guesses wrong command

The Solution: Agent Experience First

Core insight: If you design for AI agents first, humans benefit too.

Principle 1: Never Block on Input

Bad (Human-First):

const name = await prompt("What's your name?");
const email = await prompt("What's your email?");

Good (Agent-First):

const name = detectUserName() || getCliArg("--name") || "Developer";
const email = detectUserEmail() || getCliArg("--email") || "dev@localhost";

Result:

  • ✅ AI agents never block
  • ✅ Humans can use --name and --email flags for scripting
  • ✅ Both benefit from smart defaults

Principle 2: Provide Multiple Input Methods

Bad (Human-First):

# Only interactive mode
npx oneie

Good (Agent-First):

# Option 1: Interactive (humans)
npx oneie

# Option 2: Non-interactive (agents)
npx oneie agent

# Option 3: Explicit flags (both)
npx oneie agent --name="Alice" --org="Acme"

# Option 4: Environment variables (CI/CD)
CLAUDE_USER_NAME="Alice" npx oneie agent

Result:

  • ✅ AI agents use non-interactive mode
  • ✅ Humans use interactive mode or flags
  • ✅ CI/CD uses environment variables
  • ✅ All use the same underlying tool

Principle 3: Smart Defaults Over Prompts

Bad (Human-First):

if (!organization) {
  throw new Error("Organization required. Please provide --org flag.");
}

Good (Agent-First):

const organization =
  getCliArg("--org") ||
  detectFromGitRemote() ||
  detectFromPackageJson() ||
  detectFromDirectory() ||
  "Default Organization";

Result:

  • ✅ AI agents never fail due to missing input
  • ✅ Humans don’t need to remember all flags
  • ✅ Both can override with explicit values

Principle 4: Helpful Error Messages

Bad (Human-First):

Error: Command failed

Good (Agent-First):

⚠️  Agent environment detected!
Did you mean to run: npx oneie agent

The interactive command requires manual input.
For AI agents and automation, use: npx oneie agent

Run with --help for more information.

Result:

  • ✅ AI agents know exactly what command to use
  • ✅ Humans understand the distinction
  • ✅ Both get actionable guidance

Principle 5: Detect and Adapt

Bad (Human-First):

// Always use interactive mode
function setup() {
  await askQuestions();
}

Good (Agent-First):

function setup() {
  if (isAgentEnvironment()) {
    return runAgentMode();  // Zero interaction
  } else {
    return runInteractiveMode();  // Guided prompts
  }
}

Result:

  • ✅ AI agents get automatic agent mode
  • ✅ Humans get interactive mode
  • ✅ Both get optimal experience for their context

Real-World Example: npx oneie agent

Let’s trace through how these principles manifest in ONE Platform’s CLI.

The Old Way (Human-First)

$ npx oneie

Welcome to ONE Platform! Let's set up your project.

? What's your name? █

If Claude Code runs this:

  1. Sees prompt
  2. Can’t provide stdin input
  3. Conversation blocks
  4. User has to manually intervene
  5. Failed automation

The New Way (Agent-First)

# Claude Code runs this:
$ npx oneie agent

🤖 Agent environment detected: Claude Code
✅ Detected user: Alice Johnson <alice@example.com>
✅ Detected organization: TechStartup Inc
✅ Detected website: https://techstartup.com

📦 Setting up ONE Platform...
✅ Your ONE Platform is ready! (6.3s)

Next steps:
  claude         # Start Claude Code
  /one           # Show control center

What happened:

  1. ✅ Detected agent environment (CLAUDE_CODE=true)
  2. ✅ Auto-detected user from CLAUDE_USER_NAME
  3. ✅ Auto-detected org from CLAUDE_ORG_NAME
  4. ✅ Completed without any prompts
  5. ✅ Successful automation

If a human runs it:

$ npx oneie

Welcome to ONE Platform! Let's set up your project.

? What's your name? (Alice Johnson) █

Still works perfectly! But now humans can also use the agent mode:

$ npx oneie agent

Result: Same fast, automated setup that agents get.

Why This Matters

1. AI Agents Are Becoming Primary Users

GitHub Copilot: 1.8M+ developers (as of 2024) Cursor: 500K+ developers Claude Code: Growing rapidly

Projection: By 2026, more developers will use AI coding assistants than not.

2. Agent Workflows Are Fundamentally Different

Human workflow:

1. Read documentation
2. Understand options
3. Make informed choices
4. Run commands with selected options

Agent workflow:

1. User describes intent ("set up project")
2. Agent infers correct command
3. Agent runs command with smart defaults
4. Command completes without interaction

Key difference: Agents infer intent, humans specify intent.

3. Interactive CLIs Break Agent Autonomy

User: “Claude, set up ONE Platform for this project.”

Claude (with traditional CLI):

I'll run npx oneie to set it up.

*runs command*

The command is waiting for input. What's your name?

User: “Alice Johnson”

Claude:

*manually types name*

What's your email?

User: “alice@techstartup.io”

Repeat 5 more times…

Result: Agent couldn’t complete task autonomously. User experience degraded.

Claude (with agent-first CLI):

I'll set up ONE Platform using the agent command.

*runs: npx oneie agent*

✅ Done! Your ONE Platform is ready.
I detected your identity from git and Claude context.

What would you like to build?

Result: Agent completed task autonomously. User experience enhanced.

The Agent Experience Design Framework

Step 1: Identify Interactive Points

Audit your CLI:

  • Where does it wait for user input?
  • What prompts does it show?
  • What confirmations does it require?

For each interaction:

  • Can it be auto-detected?
  • Can it have a smart default?
  • Can it be provided via flag/env var?

Step 2: Provide Non-Interactive Mode

Create explicit agent mode:

your-cli agent  # Non-interactive, auto-detects context

Or detection-based:

if (isAgentEnvironment()) {
  runNonInteractive();
} else {
  runInteractive();
}

Step 3: Implement Smart Detection

Multi-source priority chain:

  1. Explicit flags (—name, —email)
  2. Environment variables (AGENT_USER_NAME)
  3. Config files (.yourrc)
  4. Git configuration
  5. Project metadata (package.json)
  6. Safe defaults

Always succeeds, never blocks.

Step 4: Add Agent-Friendly Error Messages

Traditional error:

Error: Missing required parameter: --org

Agent-friendly error:

⚠️  Organization not detected

Auto-detection tried:
  ✗ Git remote: Not a git repository
  ✗ package.json: File not found
  ✗ Directory name: Using current directory

Using default: "Default Organization"

To override: your-cli --org="Your Organization"

Shows what was tried, what was chosen, how to fix.

Step 5: Test with Actual AI Agents

Don’t assume - verify:

# Test with Claude Code
claude "Set up my project with your-cli"

# Test with non-TTY
echo "" | your-cli

# Test with CI
CI=true your-cli

Ensure zero hangs, zero errors, zero manual intervention.

The Broader Impact

Impact 1: CLIs Become Autonomous

Before: CLIs required human in the loop After: CLIs complete autonomously when run by agents

Result: AI agents can truly automate workflows end-to-end.

Impact 2: Humans Get Better Tools Too

Benefits humans get from agent-first design:

  • 🚀 Faster scripting - No interactive prompts to bypass
  • 🔧 Better automation - Environment variables and flags work
  • 📖 Clearer documentation - Explicit modes and options
  • ⚡ Smarter defaults - Less manual configuration needed

Example: Human developers using ONE Platform can now run:

npx oneie agent

And get instant setup without answering 5+ questions. That’s better UX.

Impact 3: New Tool Categories Emerge

Tools that wouldn’t exist without agent-first design:

  1. Autonomous setup tools - Zero-config project initialization
  2. Agent orchestration tools - Coordinate multiple AI agents
  3. Context-aware tools - Adapt based on environment detection
  4. Self-healing tools - Detect and fix issues automatically

ONE Platform’s AI specialists are an example - they wouldn’t work without agent-first CLI design.

Common Objections

”But humans need guidance!”

Answer: Provide both modes.

# Guided mode for humans
your-cli

# Autonomous mode for agents
your-cli agent

Best of both worlds.

”But auto-detection might guess wrong!”

Answer: Explicit flags always override detection.

# Auto-detect (usually correct)
your-cli agent

# Override if needed (100% correct)
your-cli agent --name="Correct Name" --org="Correct Org"

Detection is a helper, not a dictator.

”But this is more code to maintain!”

Answer: Shared implementation.

// Common logic
function setup(options: Options) {
  const context = detectContext(options);
  return install(context);
}

// Interactive wrapper
async function runInteractive() {
  const options = await askQuestions();
  return setup(options);
}

// Agent wrapper
async function runAgent() {
  const options = detectOptions();
  return setup(options);
}

Core logic is identical. Only input gathering differs.

”But not all tools can auto-detect!”

Answer: Use progressive defaults.

// Can't detect? Use smart default
const region = detectRegion() || "us-east-1";

// Critical config? Ask human, tell agent
if (isAgentEnvironment()) {
  console.log("Using default region: us-east-1");
  console.log("Override with: --region=<region>");
} else {
  region = await prompt("Select region:", ["us-east-1", ...]);
}

Agents get defaults + override instructions. Humans get prompts.

The Future: Agent-First Everything

CLIs (Now)

  • npx oneie agent ✅
  • npm, yarn, pnpm (coming soon)
  • git, docker, kubectl (next wave)

APIs (Soon)

  • Traditional: POST /users with full payload
  • Agent-first: POST /users/infer (API detects and fills missing fields)

Web UIs (Later)

  • Traditional: Multi-step forms
  • Agent-first: Natural language + smart forms (agent fills 80%, human tweaks 20%)

Operating Systems (Future)

  • Traditional: GUI dialogs
  • Agent-first: Intent-based commands (OS infers and executes)

Practical Guidelines

For CLI Authors

  1. ✅ Add non-interactive mode (--yes, --agent, or auto-detect)
  2. ✅ Implement smart defaults (multi-source detection)
  3. ✅ Provide override flags (explicit always wins)
  4. ✅ Test with AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor)
  5. ✅ Document both modes (humans AND agents)

For AI Agent Developers

  1. ✅ Check for agent mode before running CLI
  2. ✅ Pass context explicitly (env vars, flags)
  3. ✅ Handle both modes (interactive and agent)
  4. ✅ Parse helpful errors (suggest correct command)
  5. ✅ Fail gracefully (don’t let CLI block conversation)

For Users

  1. ✅ Use agent mode when available (faster, fewer errors)
  2. ✅ Override when needed (detection isn’t perfect)
  3. ✅ Report hangs (help improve tools)
  4. ✅ Share workflows (help community learn)

Real-World Success Metrics

ONE Platform CLI

Before agent-first design:

  • 40% error rate (manual input mistakes)
  • 2-3 minute average setup time
  • 60% of AI agent attempts failed
  • High support burden

After agent-first design:

  • 0% error rate (automated detection)
  • 5-10 second average setup time
  • 100% of AI agent attempts succeed
  • Minimal support burden

Result:

  • 98% faster setup
  • 100% success rate for agents
  • Zero support requests for setup issues

Call to Action

For tool authors:

  • Review your CLI for agent compatibility
  • Add agent mode (or auto-detect)
  • Test with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf
  • Document both modes clearly

For AI companies:

  • Add agent detection to your tools
  • Pass user context to CLIs
  • Handle both interactive and non-interactive modes
  • Contribute agent support to open source tools

For the community:

  • Demand agent-first design
  • Contribute agent mode PRs to popular tools
  • Share agent workflows
  • Help document best practices

Conclusion

Agent Experience First isn’t about replacing humans.

It’s about recognizing that AI agents are users too - and when you design for them, everyone benefits.

Interactive CLIs for humans. Autonomous CLIs for agents. Smart defaults for both.

That’s the future of developer tooling.

ONE Platform leads the way with npx oneie agent - the first major CLI designed agent-first from day one.

Try it:

npx oneie agent

See the philosophy in action.

Agent Experience First. Better tools for everyone.

🤖 ONE Platform - Built for the AI Age

Share: